I had to open up a text editor and translate this article to normal English to read it. It starts:
Last week, the New York Times ran an article by Kirsten Han where she says she left Substack due to transphobic and anti-vaccine content. But, as Jesse Singal pointed out, Han left Substack for Ghost, a platform with even fewer content restrictions than Substack. Han’s own actions undermine the case for the restrictions she is calling for.
I clicked on the links in the article to check the sources, but now my computer is vomiting blood and my money is gone. I have unsubscribed from Ms Fox and will not recommend her newsletter.
The no porn rule for Substack is smart brand management. Early in Substacks life, people referred to it as “onlyfans but for takes”, the “onlyfans for porn” is well, onlyfans.
I think it's great business sense (for one thing, payment processors get nervous about pornographic content), but they're not justifying it as "This kind of content makes money so I'll host it." They're making a more ideological free-speech argument.
Jesus
Ever since The New Republic started leaning more left, more LASCIVIOUS UNDERGARMENTS bloggers have switched to The Atlantic.
I had to open up a text editor and translate this article to normal English to read it. It starts:
Last week, the New York Times ran an article by Kirsten Han where she says she left Substack due to transphobic and anti-vaccine content. But, as Jesse Singal pointed out, Han left Substack for Ghost, a platform with even fewer content restrictions than Substack. Han’s own actions undermine the case for the restrictions she is calling for.
thanks
I clicked on the links in the article to check the sources, but now my computer is vomiting blood and my money is gone. I have unsubscribed from Ms Fox and will not recommend her newsletter.
Best Mad Libs Ever!
This needs to be one of your narrated pieces.
Shaved housewife who can’t get enough Jesse Singal... That almost made me pee my pants
Hilarious. 👌🏼👈🏼
😍
Substack's restrictions on pornography do seem to put a damper on their "free speech for everyone!" cred.
The no porn rule for Substack is smart brand management. Early in Substacks life, people referred to it as “onlyfans but for takes”, the “onlyfans for porn” is well, onlyfans.
I think it's great business sense (for one thing, payment processors get nervous about pornographic content), but they're not justifying it as "This kind of content makes money so I'll host it." They're making a more ideological free-speech argument.
I used TTS to "read" this and "shy school girl" became "Scheiss cool girl". My brain is a place where I shouldn't spend time sometimes.
Okay, I followed most of that, but what is “Orgas Minge Very Where”?
You go girl…👍
Well, that's NOT what I expected to read today, LOL..............